Tag Archives: wwe

Physical office required for ‘carries on business’: DHC

The Delhi High Court recently narrowed the scope of the expression ‘carries on business’ and thus held that an Indian company cannot be regarded as carrying on business in Delhi if it neither has a principal office, head office, registered … Continue reading

Posted in Company Law, Consumer Law, General Law, information technology law, Intellectual Property Law, International Law, patent law, Trade Law, trademark, TRIPS, WTO/GATT | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

WWE ‘carries on business’ in Delhi: DHC

In an interesting ruling, the Delhi High Court expanded the scope of the expression ‘carries on business’ and thus held that a person can be regarded as carrying on business in Delhi if the goods are shipped on the basis … Continue reading

Posted in Contract Law, Intellectual Property Law, International Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

WWE refused injunction: DHC

The Delhi High Court refused to grant permanent injunction on an intellectual property infringement suit filed by World Wrestling Entertainment by holding that the latter is not ‘carrying on business’ within the jurisdiction of the Court. World Wrestling Entertainment alleged … Continue reading

Posted in Intellectual Property Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment