Tag Archives: pratibha

Export of patented invention permitted u/S 107A Patent Act: DHC

The Delhi High Court held that the language of Section 107A of the Patents Act, 1970 permits export from India of a patented invention solely for uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information required under any law … Continue reading

Posted in General Law, Intellectual Property Law, International Law, patent, patent law, TRIPS, WTO/GATT | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

ISR & IPER are essential inputs in examination of patents: MHC

In an attempt to cut short the delays in the grant of patents, the Madras High Court has held that Patent Cooperation Treaty (“PCT”) search reports shall be treated as an essential input in the examination of the pending national … Continue reading

Posted in Intellectual Property Law, International Law, patent, patent law, plant varieties Act, trademark, traditional knowledge, TRIPS | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

P&G restrained from using trademark ALL-AROUND PROTECTION or ALLROUNDER: DHC

The Delhi High Court restrained multinational company Procter & Gamble from using the trademark ALL-AROUND PROTECTION or ALLROUNDER or any other trademark deceptively similar to the plaintiff’s trademark ALLROUND in relation to the toothpaste market. “……prima facie use of the … Continue reading

Posted in Intellectual Property Law, International Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment