Tag Archives: opposition

IPAB chides Trademark Registry…..again

Terming it a ‘classic case of official indifference’, Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) has asked the following “very relevant” general questions from Tardemark Registry: – 1) How even before the order was passed, the online status treated the mark as … Continue reading

Posted in Intellectual Property Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

JAGUAR prevails against respondent’s trademark application for JAGUAR (for watches): IPAB

Intellectual Property Appellate Board of India (IPAB) allowed JAGUAR opposition to the respondent’s application for the registration of trademark JAGUAR in class 14 in respect of ‘watches and parts thereof but excluding clocks’. IPAB severely criticized Deputy Registrar of Trademarks … Continue reading

Posted in Intellectual Property Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Opposition Board recommendations to be provided to patentee and opponent: IPAB

Intellectual Property Appellate Board ruled that whenever the Opposition Board makes recommendations under Section 25(3)(b) of the Patent Act in a post-grant opposition proceedings both the patentee and the opponent are entitled to know the contents of the recommendations before … Continue reading

Posted in Intellectual Property Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Patent is granted on the date on which the Patent Office orders are passed: Delhi HC

Delhi High Court clarified that the date on which the patent is granted cannot be the date of issuance of certificate but has to be the date on which orders are passed by the Controller. The Court said “Certificate is … Continue reading

Posted in Intellectual Property Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment