Tag Archives: ITAT

Online subscription income can be treated as business income: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) recently held that income from online subscription services can be treated as business income and not be taxed as royalty or fee for technical services in all cases. ITAT Mumbai Bench said that for … Continue reading

Posted in Company Law, Consumer Law, Contract Law, General Law, Income Tax Law, International Law, Securities Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Corp guarantees have no bearing on profits: ITAT

In a recent ruling, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that when corporate guarantees are in the nature of shareholder activities, they have no bearing on profits and in such cases no arms length price adjustments need to be made. … Continue reading

Posted in Banking Law, Company Law, Contract Law, FDI, General Law, Income Tax Law, International Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Involuntary presence rules out resident status: DHC

The Delhi High Court recently ruled that the assesse is to be considered as non-resident Indian for the purposes of the Income Tax Act for the period for which he was in India ‘involuntarily’ on account of his passport having … Continue reading

Posted in Income Tax Law, International Law, Service Tax | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Section 254(2A) third provisio declared unconstitutional: DHC

The Delhi High Court struck down an expression in third proviso to Section 254(2A) of Income Tax Act that stipulated Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has no power to grant extension of stay beyond 365 days even if the delay in … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative Law, Banking Law, Company Law, Constitution Law, Income Tax Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Proviso to Sec 113 IT Act retrospective in nature: SC

In a very important ruling regarding levy of surcharge on block assessment of income, the Supreme Court of India ruled that the proviso to Section 113 of the Income Tax Act imposing surcharge shall not have a retrospective affect. “…….. … Continue reading

Posted in Banking Law, Income Tax Law, International Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Mere co-operation doesn’t result in an AOP: DHC

In an important ruling that seems to provide clarity on taxation of turnkey contract consortiums, the Delhi High Court ruled that ‘mere corporation’ between consortium members should not result in an Association of Persons (“AOP”) tax risk in India. The … Continue reading

Posted in Banking Law, Company Law, Contract Law, Income Tax Law, International Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment