Tag Archives: carries

Permitted user can’t bring suit for the trademark infringement: DHC

Pronouncing that it lacks any territorial jurisdiction, the Delhi High Court held that the permitted user of a registered trademark cannot bring a suit for the trademark infringement under Section 134(2) of the Trademarks Act, 1999. A Division Bench of … Continue reading

Posted in General Law, Intellectual Property Law, International Law, patent, patent law, Trade Law, trademark, traditional knowledge, TRIPS | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Physical office required for ‘carries on business’: DHC

The Delhi High Court recently narrowed the scope of the expression ‘carries on business’ and thus held that an Indian company cannot be regarded as carrying on business in Delhi if it neither has a principal office, head office, registered … Continue reading

Posted in Company Law, Consumer Law, General Law, information technology law, Intellectual Property Law, International Law, patent law, Trade Law, trademark, TRIPS, WTO/GATT | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

WWE ‘carries on business’ in Delhi: DHC

In an interesting ruling, the Delhi High Court expanded the scope of the expression ‘carries on business’ and thus held that a person can be regarded as carrying on business in Delhi if the goods are shipped on the basis … Continue reading

Posted in Contract Law, Intellectual Property Law, International Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment