Tag Archives: 295

Reg. proprietor not entitled to injunction U/S 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999: BHC

In an important ruling, the Bombay High Court clarified that a proprietor of the registered trademark is not entitled to an injunction on a cause of action in infringement under Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (“Act”) where … Continue reading

Posted in General Law, Intellectual Property Law, International Law, patent, patent law, trademark, traditional knowledge, TRIPS, WTO/GATT | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Law Commission to define what constitutes hate speech: SC

Refusing to entertain a writ petition that seeks to remedy the concerns that have arisen because of “hate speeches” in the country, a Large Bench of the Supreme Court of India, however, referred to the Law Commission the issues pertaining … Continue reading

Posted in Constitution Law, Criminal Law, Election Law, General Law | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment