Parties should stick to the agreement: DHC

The Delhi High Court recently ruled that a party cannot be permitted to go back on an assignment agreement signed by it, that included an arbitration clause, vis-à-vis assigning rights in his literary works alleging that the terms of such an agreement were harsh to the party.

The Court ordered, “…when the appellant himself had signed the agreements in question having the arbitration clause in which the appellant had agreed to the terms therefore, in such a scenario, he cannot be permitted to say that the arbitration clause is of no consequence in respect of the grievance towards any clause of the agreement including its harshness, if any.”

The assignor sought revocation of the assignment agreement and approached the Copyright Board for the same even though assignment agreement had an arbitration clause. The Copyright Board dismissed the petition.

The Court also made clear that the Copyright Board is a quasi-judicial forum with limited jurisdiction. Jurisdiction in relation to remedy for breach of moral rights does not lie with the Board, it said.

About DSLegal

A full service international law firm based in New Delhi with an office in Chicago, USA.
This entry was posted in Contract Law, General Law, information technology law, Intellectual Property Law, International Law and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s