Private individuals, lawyers & judges to be considered as arbitrators: SC

The Supreme Court recently directed inclusion of private individuals, lawyers and judges to the list of retired government engineers to be considered as arbitrators by Delhi Metro Rail Corporation.

The Court reiterated that neutrality, impartiality and independence are the hallmarks of any arbitration proceedings while disallowing the existing list of names for prospective arbitrator provided by Delhi Metro Rail Corporation pursuant to an arbitration agreement.

The Court also differentiated between independence and impartiality. The Court held” Independence and impartiality are two different concepts. An arbitrator may be independent and yet, lack impartiality, or vice versa. Impartiality, as is well accepted, is a more subjective concept as compared to independence. Independence, which is more an objective concept, may, thus, be more straightforwardly ascertained by the parties at the outset of the arbitration proceedings in light of the circumstances disclosed by the arbitrator, while partiality will more likely surface during the arbitration proceedings.”

About DSLegal

A full service international law firm based in New Delhi with an office in Chicago, USA.
This entry was posted in Administrative Law, Arbitration Conciliation Law, Company Law, Contract Law, General Law and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s