Rule 5 (1) of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 ultra vires Sections 66 and 67 of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994: DHC

In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court ruled that Rule 5 (1) of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 which provides for inclusion of the expenditure or costs incurred by the service provider in the course of providing the taxable service in the value for the purpose of charging service tax is ultra vires Sections 66 and 67 of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994, and travels much beyond the scope of those Sections.
The Court said “The expenditure or costs incurred by the service provider in the course of providing the taxable service can never be considered as the gross amount charged by the service provider ‘for such service’ provided by him.”
“Apart from travelling beyond the scope and mandate of the Section 67, the Rule may also result in double taxation”, the Court said. “It is true that there can be double taxation, but it is equally true that it should be clearly provided for and intended; at any rate, double taxation cannot be enforced by implicatio”, the Court further said.
“This is a clear mandate that the value of taxable services for charging service tax has to be in consonance with Section 66 which levies a tax only on the taxable service and nothing else”, the Court added.

About DSLegal

A full service international law firm based in New Delhi with an office in Chicago, USA.
This entry was posted in General Law, Service Tax and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s